The "Shadow AI" Problem
"20 Devs Using ChatGPT Differently"
Your junior devs are pasting code from Claude that doesn't follow your style guide. You're accumulating "Vibe Coding" debt. ProdMoh enforces your standards before code is generated.
What You're Actually Thinking
Not the conference talk version. The real version.
Marketing speak:
"We need to maximize ROI on engineering resources."
What you're actually thinking:
"Why is headcount up 2x but velocity is flat?"
Marketing speak:
"Achieve product-market fit at scale."
What you're actually thinking:
"Are we building features that actually close deals?"
Marketing speak:
"Scale your engineering operations."
What you're actually thinking:
"Things are starting to break."
Marketing speak:
"Make data-driven product decisions."
What you're actually thinking:
"Stop guessing. What are the big customers actually asking for?"
The "Shadow AI" Problem
What's happening while you're in meetings
The thing that keeps you up at night:
"I have 20 developers using ChatGPT, Claude, and Cursor. Each one is prompting differently. Each one is getting different code. None of it follows our style guide. None of it uses our architectural patterns. We're building Frankenstein's codebase."
Random Prompts
Everyone prompts AI differently. One dev gets React classes, another gets hooks, a third gets some weird hybrid.
No Context
AI doesn't know your repo uses Hexagonal Architecture. It just generates whatever Google taught it in 2021.
"Vibe Coding"
Junior devs paste and pray. The code works. But it's not YOUR code. It's not how YOUR team builds things.
Enforce the Standard
Don't ban AI. Control it. Make it work YOUR way.
Spec-First Workflow
We block the "Generate Code" button until a Technical Spec exists. No spec? No AI code. It's that simple.
Translation: Developers can't just vibe-code anymore. They have to think about what they're building first.
Context Injection
We auto-inject your repo's architectural patterns into every prompt. "Hexagonal Architecture." "React Hooks Only." "Our error handling pattern."
Translation: AI generates code that looks like your Staff Engineer wrote it. Every time.
The Outcome
Junior Devs Ship Senior-Quality Code
Same Patterns
Every dev, same architecture
Same Style
Your conventions, enforced
Same Quality
Looks like Staff wrote it
Bottom line: You stop reviewing AI code and start reviewing features.
What You Can Standardize
Rules that get baked into every AI prompt
🏗️ Architecture
- → Hexagonal / Clean Architecture
- → Domain-Driven Design patterns
- → Repository pattern for data access
- → Service layer conventions
⚛️ Frontend
- → React Hooks only (no classes)
- → Specific state management (Zustand, Redux)
- → Component file structure
- → CSS methodology (Tailwind, CSS Modules)
🔐 Security
- → Input validation requirements
- → Authentication patterns
- → PII handling rules
- → No secrets in code
📊 Observability
- → Structured logging format
- → Error handling patterns
- → Metrics and tracing
- → No console.log in production
For the VP Who's Terrified
You've seen what happens when developers use AI without guardrails. You don't want to ban it — that's a losing battle. You want to control it. Make it work on YOUR terms.
Take Back Control of Your AI
20 developers. 1 standard. Code that looks like your best engineer wrote every line.
Try ProdMoh FreeFree tier available · No credit card required
Explore more use cases