Use Cases โ†’ Velocity Paradox
#2 Scaling Engineering Teams

The Velocity Paradox
"Why Did We Get Slower After Hiring 10 More Engineers?"

You scaled your team. Now you're in meetings all day. Nothing ships. ProdMoh replaces "alignment meetings" with specs โ€” so new hires ship without you holding their hand.

The 11 PM Thought

๐ŸŒ™

What you're thinking while staring at the ceiling:

"I miss the days when it was just three of us in a room. We shipped daily. Now we have 30 people, we spend all week in 'syncs' and 'alignment meetings,' and we shipped... nothing this week. I feel like I'm paying for overhead, not output."

๐Ÿ“Š

After reviewing the sprint:

"Half the tickets are 'blocked โ€” waiting for clarification' or 'blocked โ€” needs design input.' We have 5 meetings scheduled tomorrow to unblock them."

๐Ÿ‘ฅ

After the new hire standup:

"They've been here 3 weeks and are still 'getting context.' Meanwhile, I have to review their PR and explain why it doesn't match what we discussed."

๐Ÿ’ธ

Looking at the burn rate:

"We're paying $1.5M/year in engineering salaries. Our biggest output last month was 2 bug fixes and 1 minor feature. That's... $500k per feature?"

๐Ÿ”„

Every Monday morning:

"The new team built it wrong. 'That's not what we discussed.' Now we're redoing 2 weeks of work. The original 3 of us would have just done it right."

The Real Problem

When you hire fast, communication breaks

โŒ The "Alignment" Trap
๐Ÿ‘ค Founder has an idea
โ†’ Explains in Slack (incomplete)
๐Ÿ“… Meeting to clarify
๐Ÿ’ป Engineer builds (their interpretation)
โŒ "That's not what I meant"
๐Ÿ“… Another meeting
๐Ÿ”„ Rebuild...

Result: 3 weeks to ship what should take 3 days

โœ“ The ProdMoh Way
๐Ÿ‘ค Founder has an idea
โ†’ Rough description to ProdMoh
๐Ÿ“‹ Complete PRD + TDD generated
๐ŸŽฏ Edge cases, acceptance criteria, architecture
๐Ÿ’ป Engineer builds (to spec)
โœ“ Ships correctly, first time

Result: Async handoff. No meetings. Ship in days.

ProdMoh: Your Async Architect

Turn your raw vision into rigid technical specs instantly. New hires ship without hand-holding.

Replace Alignment Meetings With

Instant Specs

๐Ÿ’ญ
Your Idea
โ†’
๐Ÿ“
PRD
โ†’
โš™๏ธ
TDD
โ†’
๐Ÿค–
AI Prompts
โ†’
๐Ÿš€
Shipped
โœ“ Zero Alignment Meetings

The spec is the alignment. Engineers read it, build it, ship it.

โœ“ Faster Onboarding

New hires get context from specs, not from asking you the same questions.

โœ“ Right First Time

Edge cases and acceptance criteria are defined upfront. No "that's not what I meant."

The Math

What replacing meetings with specs actually saves

40+

hours/week saved

8 hrs ร— 5 engineers = 1 full FTE

$150K

per year saved

Time you're paying for that goes to shipping

3x

faster feature velocity

No more "that's not what I meant" rebuilds

Simple math: If each engineer spends 8 hrs/week in "alignment" calls, a 5-person team loses 40 hours/week โ€” that's a full engineer's worth of output, every single week. ProdMoh gives that back.

Stop Paying for Overhead

Your 30-person team should ship more than your 3-person team. Replace meetings with specs.

Try ProdMoh Free arrow_forward

Free tier available ยท No credit card required