Engineering Strategy • December 2025

Case Study: Reducing Feature Drift Using MCP in a Payments Engineering Team

A real-world style case study showing how a payments team eliminated feature drift and reduced engineering rework by integrating ProdMoh + MCP into their developer workflow. This is a blueprint-level guide demonstrating how structured PRDs and machine-readable story fragments dramatically improve alignment and velocity.

Context: Why Payments Teams Experience Feature Drift

Payments engineering teams operate in one of the most specification-sensitive domains: pricing logic, tax rules, compliance, fraud checks, risk scoring, and payout calculations. Even minor interpretation errors can lead to:

This team (we’ll call them Acme Payments) repeatedly hit a common pattern:

Problem

Product intent was documented in long-form PRDs, but developers implemented from tickets, chat threads, and memory — creating a widening gap between expectation and execution.

The result? **Feature drift** — where the system behaves correctly according to the code but incorrectly according to the business logic.

Symptoms of Feature Drift at Acme Payments

Over 18 months, the team saw:

The root cause wasn’t talent or tooling—it was the absence of a structured, machine-readable “single source of product truth”.

Why MCP Was Chosen

Acme Payment’s architecture team evaluated multiple approaches but ultimately selected:

The winning reason:

Breakthrough

MCP removes the “air gap” between product specification and developer implementation by making requirements available inside the IDE itself.

Instead of reading a PRD in Google Docs, developers could fetch the exact story, acceptance criteria, examples, and constraints directly through an MCP call.

Use Case: “Paid Badge” Feature

The team chose a representative feature to pilot: displaying a “paid” badge on search results for items with non-zero price.

The Old Workflow (Pre-MCP)

This led to three regressions in six months — all caused by partial interpretation of rules.

The New Workflow (With MCP)

The PM created this story in ProdMoh:

{
  "id": "S-100",
  "title": "Display paid badge on priced items",
  "intent": "Show 'paid' badge for items where price > 0",
  "acceptance": [
    {"type":"predicate","expr":"product.price > 0 implies badges includes 'paid'"},
    {"type":"predicate","expr":"product.price == 0 implies badges excludes 'paid'"}
  ],
  "examples": [
    {
      "query": "red shoes",
      "product": {"id":"p-123","price":199},
      "expected": {"badges":["paid"]}
    }
  ],
  "meta": {
    "version":"2025.11.1",
    "author":"pm@acme.com"
  }
}

When the developer typed: 

generate component for search results

Their IDE (Cursor) automatically called: 

GET /mcp/prd/S-100?file=src/search/results.ts

And they immediately saw:

No guesswork. No misinterpretation.

Impact on Development Workflow

1. Test generation from acceptance criteria

The IDE plugin translated predicates into a Jest test: 

test('shows paid badge for non-zero price', () => {
  const product = { price: 199 };
  const badges = getBadges(product);
  expect(badges).toContain('paid');
});

This test becomes the executable contract for the feature.

2. Edge cases surfaced automatically

MCP surfaced that price == 0 must exclude the badge — a rule often forgotten in the old flow.

The IDE generated the negative test automatically: 

test('does not show paid badge for zero price', () => {
  const product = { price: 0 };
  const badges = getBadges(product);
  expect(badges).not.toContain('paid');
});

3. Removal of ambiguous tickets

Instead of summarizing stories into Jira, PMs linked Jira tickets to the canonical story ID: 

Story: S-100  
Source: ProdMoh (version 2025.11.1)

The Jira ticket became a delivery node, not the source of truth.

4. CI gating using PRD versions

The platform team added a simple MCP validation step in Github Actions: 

- name: Validate PRD version
  run: |
    python scripts/verify_prd_tests.py --prd S-100

If tests didn’t match acceptance criteria → PR blocked.

This eliminated the silent drift between requirements → tests → implementation.

Results After 30 Days

After one month using MCP + ProdMoh, Acme Payments measured:

Metric Before After Improvement
Clarification threads per PR 6.1 2.3 -62%
Feature drift defects per quarter 13 3 -76%
PR cycle time 4.7 days 3.8 days -18%
Rework per feature 1.8 cycles 0.7 cycles -61%
Bottom Line

The team didn’t become faster by typing quicker — they became faster by eliminating misalignment.

Team Feedback

Product Managers

“It’s the first time engineering sees the same story we wrote — word for word, constraint for constraint.”

Developers

“Tests generate themselves now. I spend less time interpreting and more time building.”

Engineering Managers

“We can audit PRD versions tied to commits. It’s finally possible to trace why code behaves the way it does.”

Why MCP Solved the Problem

Together, they formed a closed loop: intent → implementation → verification → feedback.

Blueprint for Adopting This in Your Org

If you want to replicate Acme’s success, follow this rollout plan:

Phase 1 — Foundation

Phase 2 — Pilot

Phase 3 — Scale

Conclusion

Feature drift is not an engineering failure — it’s a communication tax baked into how teams work. By connecting structured PRDs directly into developer tools via MCP, organizations break the drift cycle entirely.

Acme Payments didn’t just ship faster; they shipped with clarity, confidence, and traceability. And any modern product team can replicate this pattern.

Read Next